Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Lienard-Wiechert Potentials


Lienard-Wiechert Potentials

We have been assuming the electrostatic potential:
but if the source and test charges are moving with respect to each other, in which frame is r calculated?  In particular, do we use the r value in the test charge frame or the source charge frame?  If the charges are moving these are two different values. 

Consider two particles, a stationary test charge, qt, and a moving source charge, qs at a retarded time with respect to the test charge.  To an observer in the qt frame, qs is a distance rt away from qt at t=0, and is, we will assume, moving directly away from qs with speed beta = v/cWhat is the separation for an observer in the qs frame however? 

We need to address a conceptual issue before we can answer this question.  What do we mean by “now” for the qs observer?  When talking about potentials we must use the retarded positions of the source charges.  Because the qs charge is moving this makes a difference.  To the qs observer the retarded position of the qt charge, the position that the qs can see, is at a different time (and position) than being calculated by the qt observer.  To make sense of this question we must have the qs observer calculate the distance to the advanced position of the qt charge from the qs frame.  The problem is to calculate the separation in space between qt and qs at two events (space-time positions) that are on a common null line, with qt in the future wrt qs.  Below is a Minkowski space-time diagram of the situation, as seen in the qs frame:

We will arbitrarily designate the coordinates at qt as being the origin.  We will also specify that the qs frame space-time origin is at the same place as the qt origin, at the moment we are calculating.  Thus in the qt frame the qs position is, if we align the x axis with r:

Note that we are using space coordinates here.  That is, the time coordinate is being measured in distance.  We use the Lorentz transform to get the qs position

Thus the spatial separation of the charges in the qs frame is:

Thus the potential the qs observer would calculate at the advanced position of qt is:


Where here phi, the potential, is calculated from the qs observers point of view to the advanced position of qt.  In this frame there is no magnetic field.  Thus the potential energy of the interaction does not depend on the speed of the test charge.  It seems reasonable to assume that this energy of interaction will be transformed to the test charge frame via the Lorentz transform, and in fact this gives us the correct answer.

What is this potential as transformed back to the qt frame?
or

These potentials are called the Lienard-Wiechert Potentials.  The forces on the test charge are then:

Where now phi and A are as calculated in the qt frame.  The separation is larger in the source charge frame (if it is receding from the test charge), but that increased separation is partially compensated for by the Lorentz transformation from the source to test charge frames.

Note the effect the 1+beta term in the denominator has.  If the source charge is receding at near the speed of light, the potentials, and thus the forces, are reduced by one half.  On the other hand, if the source charge is approaching the test charge at near the speed of light, beta is negative and the potentials, and thus the forces, can be arbitrarily large.

Electromagnetic Forces


Electromagnetic Forces
For the electrostatic case we calculated the force by subtracting the electrostatic potential from the total energy (h_bar omega ).  Let’s try generalizing this and subtract the electromagnetic 4-potential from the test charge energy-momentum 4-vector in the Klein-Gordon equation.  For the time being we will have to restrict ourselves to forces on stationary test charges, but we allow the source charge to move.  This means that in the Klein-Gordon equation the k term is initially zero, but there is a vector potential from the moving source charge:

We are trying to calculate the forces on a free particle.  If the potentials were constant in time this would imply that the total energy (h_bar omega ) is constant as well.  We will not make that assumption this time however.  We will assume that each term above is constant separately.  Let’s solve for omega and k, with the constant value of each term captured as omega_0 and k_0:
Where

Now expand each expression in a Taylor Series about the position r1, with respect to time and space. Keeping just the first linear terms gives:

Where x is the displacement from r1.  We now put these expressions into the wave function:

We move the gradient of the potential to the k term, as before, to get:


And now take the time derivative of the exponent to get dp/dt, the 4-force:

Or more compactly:
Or, in terms of the 4-vector potential

The first (top) term is the rate of change of energy of the test charge.  We see that this depends only on the rate of change of the electric potential.  The remaining terms are all the conventional electro-magnetic force on a stationary particle.  It depends on the gradient of the electric potential and the rate of change of the magnetic vector potential.

Note that this result is incomplete in that it does not include magnetic forces, which are only apparent when the test charge is moving.  Before addressing magnetic forces, however, we need to derive the relativistically correct way to calculate the 4-potential for a particle moving very fast, at an appreciable fraction of the speed of light.  These are the so-called Lienard-Wiechert potentials.